Art, Abuse and Forgiveness: A Gendered Privilege?

Art is often seen as a realm apart, a space where genius can transcend morality. Yet behind the curtain of creativity, the actions of some artists raise troubling questions: How can we separate the work from its creator? Can we forgive everything, especially when the artist crosses the boundaries of what is acceptable? The answers to these questions reveal not only moral biases, but also deep-seated prejudices about gender, which influence how artists – both men and women – are judged and forgiven.

The Moral Dilemma: Separating the Man from the Work?

Some argue for a clear distinction between the man and his work. According to this perspective, a work of art belongs to the collective cultural heritage, regardless of the faults of its author.

Furthermore, the reception of a work is subjective and evolves over time.

Judging a creation solely through the prism of its creator’s morality could lead to excessive censorship.

The idea of ​​separating the man from the work reaches its limits when the actions of an artist directly contaminate his creation. For example, works glorifying hateful ideologies or exploiting abuses perpetrated by their author pose a major ethical problem. Supporting such creations, even indirectly, amounts to giving a platform to destructive behaviors or ideas. The issue is all the more complex since an artist’s work can become a vector of immense influence.

Finally, it is essential to recognize the complexity of the debate. Not all works deserve the same treatment. Some can be re-evaluated in light of their historical context and the actions of their authors. Others, however, must be questioned for their active role in perpetuating oppressive systems. Let us judge the present, therefore, more than the past which, often, serves to divert attention or to make the current situation more acceptable because “better than before” which is added to “better than elsewhere”.

The dark areas behind the light

Some talented artists have always distinguished themselves by reprehensible behavior. Richard Wagner and his anti-Semitism, Pablo Picasso and his toxic behavior towards women, or Roman Polanski, accused of rape, are among these controversial figures who are nevertheless continued to be celebrated for their artistic genius.

These examples reveal a strange paradox: art seems to serve as a moral shield for its creators. We forgive, we excuse, we look the other way, in the name of cultural heritage. This indulgence is particularly marked when it comes to men, their crimes or abusive behaviors being relegated to “details” compared to their talent.

Sexual crimes in art: a scourge under silence

The artistic world, like other spheres of power, is not immune to the worrying frequency of sexual crimes. Certain renowned figures, protected by their status, have long acted with impunity. The Harvey Weinstein scandal revealed the extent of abuse in the film industry, even if it only represents the tip of the iceberg. It also highlighted a universal phenomenon: power structures favor the behavior of the tormentors by stifling their crimes. For decades, artistic institutions (such as religious or sports institutions, etc.) have protected their male members by blaming the victims or demanding their silence.

Artists and Political Ideologies: Persistent Biases

The reprehensible acts of artists are not limited to sexual crimes or toxic behavior. Some have actively supported oppressive ideologies. Ezra Pound, a poet of genius, was a fervent supporter of fascism. Louis-Ferdinand Céline, a key figure in French literature, wrote virulently anti-Semitic pamphlets. Yet their literary talent continues to be celebrated, often without mention of their nauseating political ideas.

Despite destructive ideological positions, they remain essential figures in their field. Conversely, women who have dared to express strong political or feminist ideas have often been marginalized or discredited.

Frida Kahlo, although celebrated today, was long considered simply “Diego Rivera’s wife” before being recognized as a major artist and activist. Her political beliefs – communist and anti-colonial – were often reduced to eccentric details, while men who shared the same ideals were taken intellectually seriously.

Women judged more harshly

Where a man might be excused for his excesses in the name of his “genius”, a woman would be criticized for much less serious attitudes. “Diva” behavior – often a simple refusal to conform to sexist norms – was judged more harshly than criminal acts committed by their male counterparts.

Thus, artists like Mariah Carey or Madonna were mocked or vilified for their character, while men accused of sexual violence continued to receive prestigious awards. This double standard illustrates the extent to which the notions of forgiveness and tolerance are gendered.

Edifying examples

Consider Britney Spears, whose meteoric rise was followed by a public descent into hell, largely orchestrated by the media and the industry. Her independence and personal development were perceived as threats, to the point of placing her under conservatorship for years. Meanwhile, men like Woody Allen, who married his own daughter and is accused of sexual abuse, or John Lennon, known for his violent behavior towards his first wife, continue to be celebrated without being questioned.

A Forgiveness That Questions

Why do we forgive men so easily? The answer lies in the patriarchal dynamics that permeate our culture. The male artist is seen as an indomitable genius, whose excesses are part of creativity. “He’s a bon vivant. It’s all bawdy. He’s so likeable.” Their “eccentricity” or “psychological complexity” are praised, while women, subjected to expectations of docility and moral perfection, are quickly judged for any breach of these norms.

This male indulgence contributes to perpetuating a culture where victims—often women and/or children—are ignored or blamed.

Talented female figures are relegated to the shadow of their male counterparts, and on the poster and on the pay slip, while being objectified and sexualized to the extreme.

This bias is reinforced by a patriarchal culture that values ​​the cultural production of men, even when it is tainted by immoral behavior. The works of male artists are perceived as universal contributions, while those of women are often confined to personal or activist issues.

A universal prejudice: the artist is a man

The very idea of ​​the artist, in the collective imagination, is deeply gendered. Historically, artistic creation has been associated with men, to the point of making women almost invisible in this sphere. This perception is so ingrained that for decades no one has questioned the gender of the artists who painted the Lascaux caves.

These world-famous prehistoric paintings have always been attributed to men, without asking themselves the slightest question for a second, with the implicit idea that they were the only ones capable of such an act of creation and that women, since the very origins of our species, have never had a place. Yet recent studies challenge this certainty: analyses of handprints on walls suggest that the creators could very well have been women. This discovery shakes up our certainties, but also highlights the bias deeply rooted in our minds: automatically associating genius or innovation with a man.

This bias extends well beyond prehistory. How many women artists have seen their work eclipsed or attributed to men, intentionally or not? How many have been reduced to the role of muses or assistants, when they were themselves accomplished creators?

Erasure of Women in Other Fields

This bias is not limited to art: it extends to science, technology, and many other fields. In fact, it does not escape any field when it comes to status, power, and talent.

Women have been pioneers in fields like computer science, but their contributions have been systematically invisibilized. Ada Lovelace, the first female programmer, or the coders of the Apollo missions have seen their roles minimized or erased in favor of male figures. Who knows Einstein’s wife, her contribution to his work, and the thanks she received for it?

This erasure is not only historical: it is still actively perpetuated. Young girls are often discouraged, consciously or not, from investing in fields perceived as “masculine”. This social bias not only limits their opportunities, but also their confidence in their abilities. Misogyny is instilled in women to the point that they often become even more so than the man they side with.

Thus, while women must fight to have their talents and contributions recognized, men often enjoy automatic forgiveness, even when they transgress moral or legal norms.

Towards a collective questioning

Current culture, marked by movements such as #MeToo, is beginning to question these dynamics, even if an obvious global regression is underway. The automatic forgiveness granted to male artists, often to the detriment of victims, is no longer systematic. However, much remains to be done to eliminate these deeply rooted biases.

It is crucial to recognize that the problematic behaviors of artists should not be minimized, regardless of their gender. But it is equally essential to question the way in which men are systematically protected by their talent, their power, their status... while women suffer disproportionate sanctions for much lesser faults.

Recognize and Restore

This historical dynamic shows that forgiveness – or the lack thereof – reveals our priorities as a society. Whether we are in art, science, or any other sphere, it is urgent to:

1. Restore women’s place in history: by rehabilitating those who have been erased, by recognizing their contributions, by changing the narratives that exclusively glorify male figures.

2. Refuse automatic indulgence towards male abuse: talent or genius must no longer be an excuse to minimize or ignore reprehensible behavior.

3. Deconstruct gender myths: especially the one that intrinsically links creativity, innovation or genius to masculinity, to the detriment of women and their potential.

Copyright © 2024 edpunezpicco